Juan C. Garnica-Cuéllar 1
, Rubén Silva-Tinoco 2
, Fabiola Ruiz-Velasco-Hernández 3
, Alberto S. Benítez-Rentería 3
, Sonia C. Juárez-Comboni 4 
1 Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, Ciudad de México, México; 2 Clínica especializada en el manejo de la Diabetes, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Bienestar Servicios de Salud Pública, Ciudad de México, México; 3 Dirección Médica, AstraZeneca México, Ciudad de México, México; 4 AstraZeneca PLC, Cambridge, Inglaterra
*Correspondence: Juan C. Garnica-Cuéllar, Email not available
Objective: To describe cardiorenal risk in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care.
Method: The iCaReMe Global Registry is a prospective, multicenter, observational project designed to provide real-world information on the care of patients with T2D. It is a cross-sectional analysis of the iCaReMe study in a Mexican cohort. Cardiovascular risk (CVR) was stratified using the European Society of Cardiology 2019 guidelines classification. Renal risk was estimated using the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio and the minimum resource model developed by Gendius to predict a reduced glomerular filtration rate.
Results: A total of 2,761 patients with T2D were included. Elevated and very elevated CVR was identified in 2,663 (96.4%). Albuminuria was present in 658 (24.6%). In a subgroup, structural and/or functional cardiac abnormalities were reported by echocardiography in 499 (38%). Glycated hemoglobin < 7% was present in 31.1%, and 15.3% were on therapy with cardiorenal benefit.
Discussion: A high proportion of patients with T2D in Mexico have a high cardiorenal risk. Health care policies are needed that allow for timely treatment in people at high risk for cardiovascular disease and kidney disease.
Content available in Spanish only.
Mallorca, 310
08037 Barcelona (España)
Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
11560 Ciudad de México (México)
This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics
Visitors: 2,538